🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart atomic talks with the United States as long as it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations worked, and shared fresh requests had been made by go-betweens to resume discussions with the US government. He said Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Path

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult path since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Unexpectedly Terminated

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that ended with the American leader asserting the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries exercised their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with American involvement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the agreement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the offer could be revived in certain ways if discussions resume.

Trump last week claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting consistent overtures from America either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Continues the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to dictate their demands during the talks. Negotiations can still be active and stays the primary solution to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they address to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and honor, they will receive a reply in the identical approach."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this conflict; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He stated: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the nation in the aftermath of this attack."